Private
finance
Debt
Tax
justice
Aid
Financial
architecture

Mexico: illicit financial flows, macroeconomic imbalances, and the underground economy

Added 02 Feb 2012

Eurodad partner Global Financial Integrity have released a very interesting report in English and Spanish about illicit financial flows, macroeconomic imbalances, and underground economy in Mexico

The report finds that Mexico lost a total of $872 billion in illicit financial flows (or illegal capital flight) over a 41-year period from 1970 to 2010. These illicit financial flows were generally the product of: corruption, bribery and kickbacks, criminal activities, and efforts to shelter wealth from a country's tax authorities.

Illicit Financial Flows Breakdowns:

  • Total capital flight represents approximately 5.2 percent of Mexico's GDP over the 41-year period ending in 2010; IIlicit flows peaked in 1995 at 12.7 percent of GDP.
  • Average outflows increased sharply in each successive decade; They were $3 billion in the 1970s, $US10.4 billion in the 1980s, $US17.4 billion in the 1990s, and $49.6 billion in the decade ending 2009.
IFF Drivers: The growth of the underground economy and trade mispricing are found to be significant drivers of Mexico's illicit financial flows. In fact, illicit flows and the underground economy are found to drive each other, creating a feedback loop.

Analysis

There is a stable relationship between the volume of illicit outflows and the onset and aftermath of Mexico's macroeconomic crises during the 41-year period. With reference to the six crises studied, illicit outflows increased in the crisis year compared to the two years preceding the crisis.
Furthermore, illicit flows through trade mispricing rose sharply after NAFTA came into being. The following chart shows this acceleration
The cross-border holdings of bank deposits reported to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) show that the United States, offshore financial centers or tax havens in the Caribbean, and tax havens in Europe, are the three top destinations for Mexican private sector deposits. These deposits consist of both licit and illicit funds. However, due to a lack of data on withdrawals and incomplete reporting by financial institutions it is not possible to determine the destinations of illicit financial flows only.

Recommendations

It is clear that almost three-quarters of total illicit flows over the period 1970-2010 were generated through trade mispricing (Appendix Table 6). Moreover, model simulations indicate that increasing trade openness since 1994 when NAFTA was implemented led to more trade mispricing. This would strongly suggest that policy should be focused on curtailing trade mispricing. The report recommends three policy measures to reduce trade mispricing:
  • require risk-based price profiling;
  • require a legally binding declaration of traders between exporters and importers; and
  • undertake additional measures to curb abusive tranfer pricing.
In addition to policy action to curtail trade mispricing, the report recommends four additional policy actions to reduce illicit capital flight from Mexico:
  • expand double tax avoidance agreements;
  • require automatic cross-border exchange of tax information on personal and business accounts;
  • pursue macreconomic stability;
  • improve overall governance in order to reduce the propensity to pay bribes and kickbacks; and
  • take steps to reign in the role of offshore financial centers (OFCs) and banks;